What cloud CAD data management is right for me?

April 6, 2015

cloud-data-management-cad

The amount of data created in the cloud and transferred to the cloud is growing. You probably noticed few of my last blog posts about cloud CAD – The stage for cloud CAD competition and How CAD vendors “murdered” PDM business. CAD vendors are moving to the cloud, but the truth the competition between other cloud vendors are heating up for the ability to generate content and manage it in the cloud. The following article caught by attention over the weekend – Dropbox is working on a new note taking applications. Together with few other larger and smaller vendors, the dynamics of getting our data up to the cloud is increasing.

This is probably a good time to ask a question – what are products that can help you to organize and manage your engineering data in the cloud. Few years ago, I’ve been sharing some of my thoughts about CAD file sharing in my public discuss with Hardi Meybaum of GrabCAD. You can navigate to my old post here – Debunking the cons to CAD file sharing tools.

Today I want to take a short review of tools that became available since that time and focus primarily on managing engineering and CAD data in the cloud.

Generic cloud data (document) management tools

Yes, there are many generic cloud data management tools. Most of them are coming from vendors focused on cloud data storage. Google, Microsoft, Dropbox. There are few other tools. These tools can give you a way to put you files in the cloud without much focus on what is there (3D models, drawings, specifications, etc.)

A bit outstanding, but still a generic tools is BOX. You can learn from the website about BOX focus on industries. I shared some of my thoughts about that here – Can BOX become a platform for PLM?

Another interesting recent development is Adobe Document cloud.

Cloud CAD data management tools

New cloud CAD systems are coming with solid data management foundation. Two examples here – Autodesk A360 and Onshape data management. Both systems are capable to manage CAD data coming from multiple CAD systems.

You probably heard and seen Autodesk Fusion360. In fact Fusion360 runs on top of A360 – backbone and platform to manage data and collaborate socially about projects and changes. Project collaboration approach is a central concept of A360. You can read more here. A360 is a platform to create, collaborate and compute in the cloud. And it is capable to manage different CAD files from Autodesk and other CAD vendors. More about features and what you can do is here.

Onshape is providing core data management capabilities around Onshape documents. In of my experiments with Onshape, I’ve learned that I can upload other CAD files into Onshape documents, manage their versions and translate it into native Onshape data too. You can find this approach a bit different from A360 project. However, we can only guess where future Onshape product development will go. I found the concept of Organization management in Onshape, which can be developed in the future.

Cloud PDM tools

GrabCAD Workbench is probably one of the earliest cloud CAD data management tools. Workbench can give you an option to put multiple CAD data into cloud and manage versions. It is combined with GrabCAD Open Engineering community that allows you to leverage CAD data openly shared by about 2 millions of GrabCAD community members.

Kenesto Drive is another product you might pay attention too. After few product pivots, Kenesto came with a simple concept of “Drive” – a place where you can synchronize engineering data (including CAD files, of course) and keep using this data with your desktop tools.The following video gives you some overview of what Kenesto Drive does.

What is my conclusion? Growing interest to upload, share and manage data in the cloud will require better tools and probably new concept of data management. Customers won’t be happy with “double PDM tax”. I’m sure, the idea to move existing complexity of CAD data management in the cloud won’t excite users. My hunch customers won’t move into 100% cloud environment and we will be using both cloud and desktop in parallel for some time (I even don’t want to predict for how long). So, new paradigms will be developed to manage and collaborate heterogeneous CAD and engineering data in both cloud and desktops. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Image courtesy of watcharakun at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

 

 


Develop3D LIVE: The stage for “cloud CAD” competition

March 27, 2015

stairways-to-cloud

I attended Develop 3D Live yesterday in Warwick UK. It is probably the only vendor independent event focusing on CAD, 3D, design and engineering. It was my first time at Develop 3D Live. I think number of attendees was about 1’500 – 2’000 people at its peak time. All major CAD vendors presented at the event – Autodesk, Dassault Systemes, PTC and Siemens PLM. It was also first time public appearance for Onshape. The event was live streamed to U.S. time zones and had good twitter coverage at #D3DLive. You can follow the history of twitter stream here. I’m sure Develop3D will make recording available too.

Future CAD – #1 topic on the list

The future of CAD was the #1 topic on the list. The theme was set clear – cloud CAD. The agenda included keynotes from all CAD vendors – Carl Bass (Autodesk), Jon Hircshticsk (Onshape), Dan Staples (Siemens PLM), Gian Paolo Bassi (Dassault / SolidWorks), Brian Thompson (PTC) and the panel discussion (Future CAD) with Jon Hirschtick, Mike Payne, Kevin Schneider, Gian Paolo Bassi and Nikola Bozinovic (Fra.me / aka Mainframe2). Presentation, panel, off line conversation made me think about this interesting “cloud moment” in engineering software. I’ve heard it from many people during the event – it is a time to shake CAD industry again.

A new history of cloud CAD

I think, the first time time, word “cloud” was mentioned out loud by one of major CAD vendors was SolidWorks World 2010. That was the time when SolidWorks introduced SolidWorks cloud prototype, which worked in browser and on Mac OS. Here is the passage I captured from Cadalyst article back in 2010.

Next came the buzz-worthy preview of SolidWorks on the cloud (aka software as a service, or SaaS), wherein software is hosted on powerful server farms and users access it using an Internet browser. “This is designed not for flash, but to solve problems and make your life easier,” Ray said, adding that the technology has been in development for three years. Cloud computing overcomes the challenges of software installation and maintenance and, according to the company, keeps data secure. It is multi-platform by its very nature, meaning it is accessible to users regardless of operating system, and it can accommodate touch-based modeling and finger and pen interaction — that is, any wireless-connected device from anywhere could link the user to the full functionality of the 3D software

The period of time between 2010 and 2015 is a good demonstration of the speed of changes in engineering industry domain. It took long five years, lot of debates, many technological changes and here you go – cloud CAD became mainstream topic in the conference agenda. It still doesn’t mean the majority of CAD users are moving to the cloud. But the trend is clear – people are exploring the opportunity and potential of cloud CAD today. The reality – we are just scratching the beginning of a much bigger change of what cloud CAD will do to engineering and manufacturing software. The fun time is ahead.

Business and licensing model changes

Cloud is a topic that often brings confusion between technology and licensing. Cloud based business models are taking their roots back into ASP business (Application Service Provider) and, lately, to SaaS (Software as a Service). SaaS is a software licensing and delivery model in which software is licensed on a subscription basis and is centrally hosted. It is sometimes referred to as “on-demand software”. The “hosting” element of SaaS is not required and you can provide subscriptions for the software installed on a desktop too.

Subscription based licensing popularity is growing in engineering and manufacturing software. Many of CAD and PLM vendors are shifting their licensing into “subscription only” these days. Although, licensing is very important, it is not specifically related to “cloud CAD” discussion in my view. There are many examples of software that delivered as installed application, but sold on subscription basis.

Technologies

The discussion is heating up when it comes to cloud CAD and technologies. I want to mention some of them – data management, graphic, geometry modeling, browser, security, virtualization.

Data management is one of the key components of cloud CAD. Some of you can be surprised, but cloud CAD is coming first to solve PDM problems related to poor data management of CAD files – accessibility, locations, references, copies, sharing, versions, collaboration. To make it happen, cloud CAD should come with solid data foundation capable to manage data using modern database and cloud storage technologies.

Graphic systems. The debates here are going around how rich CAD graphic can be available on different devices – laptops and mobile devices. Remember, original CAD high performance workstations had impressive performance characteristics. Very often, CAD systems worked with dedicated graphic cards and specific memory requirements. How is it going to change? Time will show that.

Geometry modeling is important for CAD and in defines critical foundation characteristics. Interesting enough, this technology is not much in focus for the moment. I didn’t capture many discussions about that. It looks like CAD vendors are going to leverage existing geometrical kernels and will focus on geometric modeling later. Although, I can see some interesting potential to simplify migration from existing CAD systems to new cloud products using same geometric modelers. The most interesting one here is SolidWorks and SolidEdge to Onshape migration (all systems are sharing Parasolid kernel).

Browser. This is an important technological component to deliver cloud CAD. The debates “cloud vs. browser” are heating up. The ability of browser to run full CAD system is an interesting opportunity that cannot be underestimated. If browser will be capable to deliver full CAD functionality, it can become a big deal in removing entry barrier for customers. It is also connected to the discussion about “offline” use. Internet is still unreliable in some places and we are going to hear many debates how to get advantage of cloud CAD without internet access.

Security. This is “red herring” discussion. The topic of security is important, but it is equally important for non-CAD domains. Each group of customers will take their own path and speed in cloud adoption and security requirements will follow these groups.

Virtualization. This is an interesting technological topic. Especially, when it comes to the desktop. The potential to virtualize desktop and run all Windows applications “as is” on the cloud is inspiring many companies. It brings many other questions. One of them – do we really want to bring messy desktop experience to the cloud? I’d prefer to leave all file and data management problems behind and not to move it to the cloud. However, virtualization can be a greatest short term opportunity for cloud and CAD.

Cloud CAD: products and differentiations

I assume all CAD vendors are recognizing cloud as a trend, opportunity and change that is coming to the industry. Their strategies and reactions are different. Some of them are using cloud as a jump start to shake up the industry. On the conservative side, vendors accept cloud as a technology for new type of delivery models. Below, I put a short summary capturing position and reaction of CAD vendors on cloud CAD future as it was discussed during Develop3D Live.

Autodesk: Cloud is strategic direction for Autodesk. According to Autodesk, cloud is not a future, but reality Autodesk is living for the last five years. Autodesk developed many cloud products. Autodesk Fusion360 is a central part of cloud CAD offering. The focus of Fusion360 to provide support for design, engineering and manufacturing workflows by leveraging data and social collaboration.

autodeskcloud

Dassault Systems / SolidWorks: Cloud is a delivery technology for SolidWorks and Dassault. SolidWorks Industrial Design is a new cloud product for conceptual design. Cloud is part of a broader vision of 3DEXPERIENCE platform, which support a diverse set of design, engineering and manufacturing workflows.

solidworkscloud

Onshape: As a newcomer company, Onshape is laser focused on technological differentiators – pure browser and no installation required. PDM functions are included in core Onshape product and provide support for versions, branches, undo/redo and collaboration.

onshapecloud

PTC: Unfortunately, I missed PTC session at Develop3D Live. In my view, PTC is slowly moving towards cloud. One of their last announcements was about new “cloud PLM” offerings. I also think, PTC was the last CAD vendor that said “cloud” word in public. I haven’t heard about anything related to “cloud CAD” from PTC. But maybe PTC is baking something for coming PTC Live conference .

Siemens PLM / SolidEdge: Cloud is clearly a delivery technology for SolidEdge. Recently announced cloud trial version of SolidEdge delivered using virtualization layer and it is complimentary to their cloud PLM IaaS strategies.

solidedge-cloud

What is my conclusion? It is a time to shake CAD industry with cloud. I’ve heard this statement many times from attendees of Develop3D Live. It will be interesting to see the development of products and technologies for the next few years. For new vendors like Onshape (and maybe few others in stealth mode) it will be a race towards traction and customer adoption. Established CAD vendors can clearly leverage their existing customer base. It is much easier to preserve existing customers rather than sell to new ones. I’m sure we will see many interesting turns and new opportunities discovered on the road to cloud CAD. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Image courtesy of Idea go at FreeDigitalPhotos.net


PLM Thoughts After Onshape Public Beta

March 9, 2015

onshape-beta1

This morning Onshape went from stealth mode into public beta release. I’ve been using Onshape for the last few weeks. Today, I finally have an opportunity to share some of my thoughts about how I think Onshape and other cloud design systems will influence PLM implementations. The scope of PLM I’m thinking about is related to engineering collaboration, communication between people, data management, product development processes, business and enterprise integration. After all, CAD is just one tool (indeed very important one) that people in engineering and manufacturing business are using. However, it is hard to judge CAD without taking a broader look on how things are connected together.

Onshape is adding a solid voice behind industry cloud transformation. What Onshape does is coming alongside with what some other companies are doing. It is probably fair to mention two of them – Autodesk Fusion 360 and SolidWorks Industrial Design. As I wrote in my earlier post, Carl Bass and Jon Hirschtick are in agreement about future of CAD. However, I guess, there are some differences in approaches. My hunch, the industry chatter will bring lots of debates about who did what first in the cloud CAD…. However,  it is irrelevant, in my view. I just want to bring one thing to the competition story. It is a passage from Peter Thiel’s lecture about business strategy and monopoly. He calls it “competition is for losers”. Here is the thing…

….there is always this sort of idea that you want to be the first mover and I always think in some ways the better framing is you want to be the last mover. You want to be one of the last companies in that category, those are the ones that are really valid. Microsoft was the last operating system, at least for many decades. Google was the last search engine. Facebook will be valuable if it turns out to be the last of social networking site.

Getting back to Onshape and PLM, I want to speak about three things today – collaboration, PDM and mobile. I started to think about cloud CAD and PLM almost two years ago. Navigate to my old blog post about PLM and Autodesk Fusion360. The conclusion I’ve made back in 2013 was that cloud CAD systems will change the focus of PLM tools from engineering collaboration to business processes in the organization. After using Onshape for some time, I’m even more convinced about that direction. I want to bring you some of my thoughts inspired by Onshape examples.

Collaboration 

For long time, engineering collaboration was one of the core domains for PLM. The dividing line was your local or network disk storing CAD files. Beyond that point, different PLM solutions were focusing on how to give everybody access to review and markup files. It was a role of PLM systems to share 2D/3D data with the team and external suppliers.

With native cloud solution like Onshape, the need for additional visualization and collaboration tools will disappear. The data is natively available in your browser on any device at any time for anybody. Everyone can give an access to any piece of data similar to how you can do it in Google Docs.

on-shape-collaboration-2

on-shape-collaboration-1

PDM and data management

To manage revisions and data about CAD files was long time one of the main challenges for PLM development. Many PLM projects started from taking control over CAD files and helping engineers to search for the right revision of CAD files. Cloud approach is changing that. Now, CAD system is responsible for storing all data in a single place (cloud) and taking care of management of revisions.

onshape-pdm-1

onshape-pdm-2

Web and Mobile transparency 

To use data on any device is pretty common requirement for most of web applications these days.I like the idea that I can access my documents (designs) at any device and do pretty much whatever I want. From that standpoint, I can see a step forward made by Onshape to allowing to make any design action on any device. We can only speculate how comfortable to design parts and make assemblies using iPhone 6+, but I guess seamless approach is a good think looking forward.

onshape-mobile-1

onshape-mobile-2

Cloud CAD and future PLM challenges

At the same time, I want to mention few challenges that I see in connection between future development of cloud CAD software and product lifecycle management. First is related to data integration. One of the achievements of PLM deployment is to share a diverse set of data produced by multiple CAD systems. It is not unusual situation- multiple CAD systems is a reality of many customers. Cloud CAD systems like Onshape will expose PLM systems to a level of new integration challenges. Another challenge is what I call “double PDM tax“. Cloud CAD is coming with embedded data management (PDM functions). Imagine two cloud CAD systems co-existing and re-using parts and assemblies. I can see few potential solutions here, but this kind of integration will be a new thing in CAD/PLM industry.

What is my conclusion? Cloud CAD becomes a reality. I’m excited to see many new opportunities with cloud CAD tools. Onshape is clearly bringing few very fresh cloud ideas. However, after all, customers will be real voters. Wearing my PLM hat, here is my PLM specific conclusion. PLM vendors still have some time to get themselves prepared for a new reality of cloud CAD systems like Onshape and others. Data integration is clearly big deal and will become a very important thing. It is good time to re-think the role and appearance of PDM and other engineering collaboration tools. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

Pictures provided by Onshape. 


How PLM can “build itself” using artificial intelligence technologies

January 7, 2015

building-the-grid-of-data

I had a chance to visit The Art of Brick exhibition in Boston’s Faneuil Hall Museum few days ago. If you following me on social media websites, there is a chance you noticed few pictures. Afterwards, I read more about LEGO artist Nathan Sawaya. What impressed me is a power of “simple LEGO brick”. A simple plastic brick and huge amount of imagination is allowing to create such an incredible models.

lego-bricks-sawaya

You can ask me – how is that connected to engineering, manufacturing and product lifecycle management? Here is the thing… It made me think about ways PLM systems are implemented these days. I’m sure you are familiar with the “best practices” approach. The topic isn’t new. I found my old post – PLM best practices torpedo. After five years, I still like my conclusion – PLM best practices are good to show what PLM technology and software are capable to do. However, for real implementation, it is not very useful. You have to come back to a “simple bricks” of PLM technology – data models, documents, lifecycle statuses, bill of materials, processes.

I captured a bit different perspective about PLM best practices. Navigate to PLM cultural change blog – PLM design patterns. It took me back into thinking about best practices. How to define implementation patterns and make a real PLM implementation much easier? The article speaks about general way of PLM implementation can be done, organizational transformation and change. Read the article. I found the following few passages interesting:

In general you can setup all required supporting procedures in using the PLM design patterns. Even for specific supporting procedures of a business process pattern like Engineer to Order (ETO) you can derive patterns, which consists of a framework of general PLM design patterns and are adapted to the specific business needs. There is enough freedom to derive based on these patterns supporting procedures to fulfill specific business needs.

If some organizations would have implemented supporting procedures based on patterns already, then consultants in introducing PLM to an organization could refer to “state of the art” implementation examples of these organizations. The target is to convince an organization, that the decision for a new practice requesting organizational change is required and works. Only then the organization can enable the full potential of the PLM methodology without remaining stuck in the current practice.

Instead of inventing a Ping-Pong table “from scratch” with a cabinetmaker we can make a clear decision based on all the options available, fulfilling and probably exceeding our originally perceived needs (with a safe and easy-to-use folding mechanism). And we can afford it, because a stock table is cheaper than a custom built one.

The time saved in avoiding the endless discussions and continual redesign of processes because of paradigm paralysis, based on current methods, could be better used in a well-planned, strategic deployment of the new processes leading to an improved business solution.

plm-design-patterns

The idea and vision of configurable patterns and best practice is interesting. In my view, it was invented earlier as PLM toolkits, flexible data models and process templates. The key problem here is not related to technology- software does what it does. The problem is related to people and organization. Remember, technology is simple, but people are really hard. What called “to convince people” is actually a process that takes organization and people to understand their business and product development patterns. Without that understanding the chances of successful PLM implementation are very low and probability of PLM project failure is high.

So, what could be 21st century solution for that problem?

My attention today caught by a new startup – The Grid. The tagline states – AI websites that design themselves. The vision of The Grid is to change the paradigm of website building. The idea of self-building websites driven by artificial intelligence and data analysis is something worth to think about. Watch the video.

Now let me back to manufacturing companies and PLM implementations. All manufacturing organizations are different. The approach most of PLM vendors are taking these days is to classify companies by size (small, medium, large), industry (aero, auto, industrial equipment, etc), manufacturing model (mass production, configured to order, engineering to order, etc.) and many others such as locations, supply chain, existing enterprise systems (ERP, SCM, etc.). The decision matrix is huge. To make analysis of existing manufacturing company, processes, existing systems, requirements – this is what takes time and money during PLM implementation.

What is my conclusion? The opportunity we have today is coming from new way to process data. Call it cloud computing, big data, whatever. Facebook is reporting about a capability to index trillion posts. Would it be possible to capture data from an existing manufacturing company and ask PLM system to build itself? Is it a dream or a future of PLM? Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

pictures credit to The Grid website and PLM cultural change blog


PLM and Entire System Common Data Model

January 5, 2015

complex-system-bom

Products are getting more complex these days. There are multiple reasons for that. Adding of connectivity and software is one of the most visible reasons why it happens. Think about any simple gadget these days, which cost less than 99$ in US. It includes mechanical components, electrical parts and software. In additional to that, products are often functioning together with cloud-based or bluetoooth enabled software. The situation is even more complex when it comes to industrial equipment, transportation and other products.

Last year, I was blogging about the need to combine engineering and software BOM. My hunch, the problem is not solved yet. My attention caught by TEC Technology Evaluation writeup – 9 Innovation and Product Development Software Market Trends and Predictions made by Predrag Jakovljevic. One part of it speaks about the need to develop a holistic system common data model to manage an entire system. Here is passage, which speaks about that:

There is a need for a common data model for managing an entire system, i.e., both hardware and software data from ideation to end of life (EOL). Common repositories and software architectures must enable the reuse of design and components (and intellectual property, if you will). Thus the "innovation platform" has become a big concept for PLM-CAD-MOM players—Dassault Systèmes has the 3DEXPERIENCE Platform, Siemens PLM Software has its Smart Innovation Platform, and Autodesk’s A360, PLM 360, and Fusion 360 products all run on the same data model. Other vendors such as SAP and Oracle are not far behind. I question how many companies will be able to support an all-inclusive PLM to CAD to MES solution. My feeling is that “cloud rings or layers” with improved interoperability will emerge around PLM to reduce upgrade and total cost of ownership (TCO) costs.

The fact vendors are working on new platform can hint future modeling capabilities will help to manage more complex data structures. To create a "composite BOM model" with elements of mechanical, electrical and software parts can be an interesting PLM challenge. PLM vendors have been working on variety of BOM solutions for the last two decades. Product structure is a complex piece of data, which is representing a critical element of PLM data management foundation. Earlier days PLM complexity was related to product configurations and options. Today electronic and software is a new challenge for PLM data management.

What is conclusion? What was a challenge for aerospace and automotive industry 20 years, now comes in electronic gadget and IoT connected devices. The ability to manage software, electronic and mechanical parts becomes a pre-requisite for any PLM system deployment. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

photo credit upverter


Oracle Cloud PaaS will provide a magic button for PLM

September 29, 2014

oracle-hq

Cloud PLM architecture and implementations is one of the topics I’m following for the last few years. It is interesting to watch dynamics of this space from initial ignorance to careful recognition and marketing buzz. I can see differences in how PLM vendors are approaching cloud. In my view, nobody is asking a question “why cloud?” these days. At the same time, we can see large variety of strategies in cloud PLM implementations and strategies. I guess PLM vendors want to answer on the question – How to implement cloud?

The element of infrastructure is important. The strategy of Siemens PLM – one of the leaders of PLM market is heavily relying on IaaS option. I covered in my post here. At the same time, Dassault is promising to support all PLM cloud options by 2015+.

I’m following Oracle Open World these days online. Gigaom article. Earlier today, the following article caught my attention – Oracle launches upgraded cloud platform with its database and Java available as a service. One of the key elements in Oracle cloud strategy is reliance of Oracle database.

oracle-db-paas

This is my favorite passage from the article:

Oracle detailed on Sunday evening its upgraded cloud suite that includes the ability for customers to use its flagship database in the cloud as well as on-premise. Executive chairman and CTO Larry Ellison talked about the new platform, now available, during his keynote session at Oracle’s annual OpenWorld conference. Ellison (pictured above) attempted to persuade the audience that Oracle’s rejiggered cloud platform can be the all-in-one shop for users to run Oracle applications, house their data and even build out their own applications while choosing whether or not they want any or all of those items to run on the cloud. “This new Oracle in the cloud allows you to move any database from your datacenter to the cloud like pushing a button,” said Ellison. Oracle’s cloud platform consists of a software-as-a-service (SaaS), a platform-as-a-service (PaaS) and an infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) in which all three are needed by Oracle to better serve its customers who have been clamoring for the company to provide cloud services, explained Ellison.

oracle-cloud

 

multitenant-oracle-db

The point of moving any database from your data center to the cloud is fascinating. It made me think about future path to the cloud for many PLM vendors. Most of them are using Oracle database for core database functions. The specific architecture of each PLM product can be different, but to have Oracle responsible for running database in cloud environment can be an interesting opportunity to simplify cloud architecture. Instead of hosting databases using IaaS platforms, PLM products can use multi-tenant Oracle PaaS.

What is my conclusion? Major PLM vendors are looking how to “cloud-enable” their existing product and software architectures. The promise to move database from data center to cloud like pushing a button might be a bit on a marketing side. This is an alert for PLM software architects. IT managers responsible for PLM implementation can take a note to ask about how to move Enovia or TeamCenter into Oracle PaaS. To have Oracle multi-tenant database running by Oracle PaaS is an interesting option, for sure. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg


Security and permissions are showstoppers to adopt search

June 25, 2014

search-top-secret

Search and information discovery is a big deal these days. Inspired by Google and other web search giants, we want information at our fingertips at the right time. I’ve been following topic of search long time. You can jump on few of my previous articles about search – Oslo & Grap – new trajectories in discovery and search; Why engineers need exploratory search? and Pintrest will teach CAD companies to search.

You may think cost and complexity are top problems of search technologies. Crunching lots of data and connecting relevant information requires application of right resources and skills. You will be surprised, but there is one more element that drives low adoption of search in manufacturing companies – security.

Information age articles Enterprise search adoption remains low – survey speaks about survey done among 300 Enterprise IT professionals conducted by Varonis Systems. According to this survey – enterprises are afraid good search solution will allow to people o find information with no permission. Here is the passage which explains that:

The respondents were surveyed at two major security-themed industry events, the RSA Conference in February and Infosecurity Europe in April. When asked to choose the biggest obstacle to enterprise search adoption, 68% cited the risk of employees locating and accessing files they should not have permission to view. Further, even if an enterprise search solution perfectly filters out results based on established permissions, the majority of respondents indicated they are not confident that their organisation’s existing permissions are accurate. Additional obstacles to enterprise search adoption most commonly cited were accuracy of the results (36%), end user adoption (29%) and the ability of solutions to scale enough to index all the data (24%).

It made me think about complexity of manufacturing companies and enterprise organization in general. Established permissions are part of the story. The search results permissions are as good as data that enterprise systems are supplying to search software. GIGO (Grabage in, Garbage out). For many IT organization, management of security and permissions is a big deal. Think about typical manufacturing company. Tomorrow, search system can find all CAD files that were occasionally copy/pasted in different locations and shared between organizations outside of existing PDM/PLM tools. What else, multiple "publishing solutions" created variety of published copies in different formats. Add SharePoint and similar technologies sometimes adopted by divisions against approvals of central IT. Good search solution can be a litmus test to many IT organizations.

What is my conclusion? Manufacturing enterprises are complex. As I described, it driven by strategic, political and cultural lines. Search is disruptive technology that has a possibility to cross these lines and expose many elements of corporate IT problems. So, once more, we learn that only mix of technological and people skills can solve the problem. Strategists and technologist of search vendors should take a note. Just my thoughts…

Best, Oleg

[categories Daily PLM Think Tank]


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 273 other followers