<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PLM Prompt: 3D Publishing, CAD and Online Google Graphic&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://plmtwine.com/2009/12/31/plm-prompt-3d-publishing-cad-and-online-google-graphic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/12/31/plm-prompt-3d-publishing-cad-and-online-google-graphic/</link>
	<description>Product Lifecycle Management by Oleg Shilovitsky</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 21:05:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: olegshilovitsky</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/12/31/plm-prompt-3d-publishing-cad-and-online-google-graphic/#comment-3460</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[olegshilovitsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 11:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plmtwine.com/?p=3898#comment-3460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Garth, Thanks for your comment and Happy New Year! Passion makes products better... I haven&#039;t had the intention to compare different products in this space. I&#039;m considering my post as a &quot;thinking alert&quot;. I found 3D/CAD/PLM vendors sometime arrogant about their special knowledge in particular domain. Even if I agree, it is true in some cases, to take it as an axiom forever, will be a huge mistake... Best, Oleg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Garth, Thanks for your comment and Happy New Year! Passion makes products better&#8230; I haven&#8217;t had the intention to compare different products in this space. I&#8217;m considering my post as a &#8220;thinking alert&#8221;. I found 3D/CAD/PLM vendors sometime arrogant about their special knowledge in particular domain. Even if I agree, it is true in some cases, to take it as an axiom forever, will be a huge mistake&#8230; Best, Oleg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garth</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/12/31/plm-prompt-3d-publishing-cad-and-online-google-graphic/#comment-3452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 06:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plmtwine.com/?p=3898#comment-3452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oleg,

Interesting post. Yes, this type of capability -- to present 3D models into more traditional 2D layouts -- has been around for some time. Just take a look at eDrawings. It is going to be a long time before 2D ever goes away... but we&#039;d be foolish to deny the ever-increasing interest, appetite, and need for the superior communication abilities delivered by 3D information. This is not simply 3D for the sake of exploring a design... but &quot;intelligent&quot; 3D that has interactivity, links, information -- intelligence. Whether it be immersed in a product, or in an environment, 3D is the way of the future. 

In 1/2 a generation this is the way that everyone will be working, just like 3D design is the predominant way of working today (it was only 15 years ago when the design systems of today were just being rolled out). And it won&#039;t be document based, like a PDF. It will be live, real time, and delivered over the web -- just like everything else in our lives.

Nobody is doing more in this area than 3DVIA. (OK, that&#039;s a plug, but I&#039;m passionate enough to write this post at 1:16 AM on New Year&#039;s Day, so I figure I get one for that!) :)

Happy New Year!
Garth]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oleg,</p>
<p>Interesting post. Yes, this type of capability &#8212; to present 3D models into more traditional 2D layouts &#8212; has been around for some time. Just take a look at eDrawings. It is going to be a long time before 2D ever goes away&#8230; but we&#8217;d be foolish to deny the ever-increasing interest, appetite, and need for the superior communication abilities delivered by 3D information. This is not simply 3D for the sake of exploring a design&#8230; but &#8220;intelligent&#8221; 3D that has interactivity, links, information &#8212; intelligence. Whether it be immersed in a product, or in an environment, 3D is the way of the future. </p>
<p>In 1/2 a generation this is the way that everyone will be working, just like 3D design is the predominant way of working today (it was only 15 years ago when the design systems of today were just being rolled out). And it won&#8217;t be document based, like a PDF. It will be live, real time, and delivered over the web &#8212; just like everything else in our lives.</p>
<p>Nobody is doing more in this area than 3DVIA. (OK, that&#8217;s a plug, but I&#8217;m passionate enough to write this post at 1:16 AM on New Year&#8217;s Day, so I figure I get one for that!) <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Happy New Year!<br />
Garth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

