<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back to basics: PLM and Single Point of Truth?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://plmtwine.com/2009/12/14/back-to-basics-plm-and-single-point-of-truth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/12/14/back-to-basics-plm-and-single-point-of-truth/</link>
	<description>Product Lifecycle Management by Oleg Shilovitsky</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:57:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PLM Network Effect and Single Point of Truths &#171; Daily PLM Think Tank Blog</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/12/14/back-to-basics-plm-and-single-point-of-truth/#comment-9556</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PLM Network Effect and Single Point of Truths &#171; Daily PLM Think Tank Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 02:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plmtwine.com/?p=3808#comment-9556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] world. In the past, I wrote about it in few of my posts: PLM and A Single Point of Disagreement and Back to basics: PLM and Single Point of Truth and My slice of PLM Single Version of Truth. So, why I decided to come back to the story again? I [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] world. In the past, I wrote about it in few of my posts: PLM and A Single Point of Disagreement and Back to basics: PLM and Single Point of Truth and My slice of PLM Single Version of Truth. So, why I decided to come back to the story again? I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PLM SharePoint Thoughts &#171; Daily PLM Think Tank Blog</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/12/14/back-to-basics-plm-and-single-point-of-truth/#comment-9553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PLM SharePoint Thoughts &#171; Daily PLM Think Tank Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 02:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plmtwine.com/?p=3808#comment-9553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] world. In the past, I wrote about it in few of my posts: PLM and A Single Point of Disagreement and Back to basics: PLM and Single Point of Truth and My slice of PLM Single Version of Truth. So, why I decided to come back to the story again? I [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] world. In the past, I wrote about it in few of my posts: PLM and A Single Point of Disagreement and Back to basics: PLM and Single Point of Truth and My slice of PLM Single Version of Truth. So, why I decided to come back to the story again? I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olegshilovitsky</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/12/14/back-to-basics-plm-and-single-point-of-truth/#comment-4716</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[olegshilovitsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plmtwine.com/?p=3808#comment-4716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff, Sorry. Somehow, I didn&#039;t track to answer on your comment earlier. Please, take a look on the following post where I&#039;m discussion Manufacturing vs. Engineering Bill of Material. - http://plmtwine.com/2009/10/22/bom-manufacturing-and-engineering/. Best, Oleg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, Sorry. Somehow, I didn&#8217;t track to answer on your comment earlier. Please, take a look on the following post where I&#8217;m discussion Manufacturing vs. Engineering Bill of Material. &#8211; <a href="http://plmtwine.com/2009/10/22/bom-manufacturing-and-engineering/" rel="nofollow">http://plmtwine.com/2009/10/22/bom-manufacturing-and-engineering/</a>. Best, Oleg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/12/14/back-to-basics-plm-and-single-point-of-truth/#comment-3267</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plmtwine.com/?p=3808#comment-3267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am looking for a contact at a manufacturing/assembly company that is using SAP.  I want to understand how difference between the EBOM and MBOM are being handled like: inventoried sub-assemblies, Purchasing levels that don&#039;t match the EBOM, and Casting - pretty much a real world implementation of the concepts that we are talking about in the back-to-basic discussions.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am looking for a contact at a manufacturing/assembly company that is using SAP.  I want to understand how difference between the EBOM and MBOM are being handled like: inventoried sub-assemblies, Purchasing levels that don&#8217;t match the EBOM, and Casting &#8211; pretty much a real world implementation of the concepts that we are talking about in the back-to-basic discussions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

