<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PLM and Collaboration Platforms: Partnership or Buzzworks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://plmtwine.com/2009/11/03/plm-and-collaboration-platforms-partnership-or-buzzworks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/11/03/plm-and-collaboration-platforms-partnership-or-buzzworks/</link>
	<description>Product Lifecycle Management by Oleg Shilovitsky</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 21:05:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: olegshilovitsky</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/11/03/plm-and-collaboration-platforms-partnership-or-buzzworks/#comment-2856</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[olegshilovitsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plmtwine.com/?p=3527#comment-2856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Christophe, Thanks for comments! and you are very welcome to stimulate brain :)... I&#039;m loving doing the same btw. In my view growing overlap (and you emphasized it by saying- all these functions already exists in PLM systems) is not what PLM systems need. If you remember, 10-15 years ago, we have been focused on how to create &quot;tree-like UI&quot;, since OS was not able to support it out of the box. Not it does. But replicate it to the next capabilities developed by general purpose collaborative platforms, please. I hope, you will see a need to move forward and not replicate what infrastructure is doing. Just my thoughts... Oleg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christophe, Thanks for comments! and you are very welcome to stimulate brain <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> &#8230; I&#8217;m loving doing the same btw. In my view growing overlap (and you emphasized it by saying- all these functions already exists in PLM systems) is not what PLM systems need. If you remember, 10-15 years ago, we have been focused on how to create &#8220;tree-like UI&#8221;, since OS was not able to support it out of the box. Not it does. But replicate it to the next capabilities developed by general purpose collaborative platforms, please. I hope, you will see a need to move forward and not replicate what infrastructure is doing. Just my thoughts&#8230; Oleg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christophe Schuber</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/11/03/plm-and-collaboration-platforms-partnership-or-buzzworks/#comment-2855</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christophe Schuber]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plmtwine.com/?p=3527#comment-2855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, for speling mistakes (would bring value)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, for speling mistakes (would bring value)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christophe Schuber</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/11/03/plm-and-collaboration-platforms-partnership-or-buzzworks/#comment-2854</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christophe Schuber]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plmtwine.com/?p=3527#comment-2854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that a partnetship with bring value, anyway most of collaborative fonctions described above are present in the PLM Solution I know. Personaly I wonder how
to sell simple and affordable plm solution to smb market knowing that it&#039;s possible to start by using informal collaboration around documents and then to grow with formal collaboration around product dev ? 
For sure migration tolls would be needed !
Best Regards and thank for stimulating our brains]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that a partnetship with bring value, anyway most of collaborative fonctions described above are present in the PLM Solution I know. Personaly I wonder how<br />
to sell simple and affordable plm solution to smb market knowing that it&#8217;s possible to start by using informal collaboration around documents and then to grow with formal collaboration around product dev ?<br />
For sure migration tolls would be needed !<br />
Best Regards and thank for stimulating our brains</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olegshilovitsky</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/11/03/plm-and-collaboration-platforms-partnership-or-buzzworks/#comment-2849</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[olegshilovitsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 17:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plmtwine.com/?p=3527#comment-2849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Manuel, Thank you for commenting! I think, you pointed it very well- most of PLM tools are running independently from collaborative platform and frameworks. This is creates disconnect in collaboration between PLM tools and rest of the world, in my view. Best, Oleg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manuel, Thank you for commenting! I think, you pointed it very well- most of PLM tools are running independently from collaborative platform and frameworks. This is creates disconnect in collaboration between PLM tools and rest of the world, in my view. Best, Oleg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manuel Joseph</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/11/03/plm-and-collaboration-platforms-partnership-or-buzzworks/#comment-2848</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manuel Joseph]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 16:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plmtwine.com/?p=3527#comment-2848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How can there be overlap in PLM systems, when there is no common framework between any PLM systems. Without any standard, we will see new business giving way to new PLM tools, all one better than the other, thus making customers confuse on which way they need to go. without these common framework, any other newcomer will be an another tool.

Advantages of a common framework will put future PLM tools to have small business create collaboration tools that work with any PLM tool, thus extending the capabilities beyond just design/engineering/PDM.

Manuel Joseph
Teamcenter Admin
Robert Bosch LLC]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can there be overlap in PLM systems, when there is no common framework between any PLM systems. Without any standard, we will see new business giving way to new PLM tools, all one better than the other, thus making customers confuse on which way they need to go. without these common framework, any other newcomer will be an another tool.</p>
<p>Advantages of a common framework will put future PLM tools to have small business create collaboration tools that work with any PLM tool, thus extending the capabilities beyond just design/engineering/PDM.</p>
<p>Manuel Joseph<br />
Teamcenter Admin<br />
Robert Bosch LLC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

