PLM in 21st Century: Fewer Giants, Folksonomies and Infinite Opportunity

July 21, 2009

future-trendsIn the early beginning of the Internet in the late 80s of 20th Century, MIT professor Tom Malone started to think how Internet will re-shape industry landscape in 21st Century. In a series of papers, he predicted that huge top down corporations would soon decentralize and transform themselves into industry eco-systems. Huge companies were created in the past to minimize “transaction cost” between teams down to supply chain. Modern distributed networks and information systems will do the same outside the walls of single company. However, actually for the last 10 years we observed a huge parade of growing gigantic companies – global consolidations happened all over the places, in pharmaceutical, chemical, finance, automotive and other sectors we had chance to see unprecedented growths of big companies. And… then 2008 crashes in finance sectors happened. Big finance corporations turned out  to have been inflated by debt at the level never seen before, the big car corporations crashed head-on skyrocketing oil prices and plummeting consumer demands…

Obviously, all these changes also impacting Product Lifecycle Management industry. First PLM companies were born of big defense, aerospace and automotive companies, providing initial backup to companies first developed CAD and coming later Product Lifecycle Management brands. What will happen with these companies in the changed landscape of traditional industries?

I think, today, we are finally coming to the point where Internet will start playing a significant role in future PLM development. In the landscape of fewer gigantic corporations, Internet will play a role of infrastructure between multiple numbers of smaller players in a supply chain of existing OEMs and in the ecosystem of many of the newcomers… Opposite to well-know today hierarchical PLMs, Folksonomies (also known as collaborative tagging, social classification and social indexing) will play a bigger role in organizing of smaller systems together. Big exposure of top-down systems will create infinite set of opportunities in providing solution for smaller companies. These smaller companies will behave in absolutely different way.

So, what will be key principles for future Product Lifecycle Management Solutions? I’d like to figure out three major characteristics that will form future Internet based PLM in 21st century.

#1 – Flexible Data Organization. PLM will be transformed to live in an open Internet world. We will not be able to apply today’s principles of data governance on PLM data management. PLM systems will be requested to co-exist in the big network of small companies operating in single cloud-y space. Transparency of information will play more important role in future data organization.

#2 – Social Networking. People and Organization system will be transformed into global social networks. Boundaries between a company network and social network of suppliers, partners and customers will be blurred. Together with information transparency, social network will create a network of future business opportunities for big number of independent companies – suppliers social networks.

#3 – Crowdsourcing. Global data availability and global people network will open new opportunities for work organization. What we have today as global design and global manufacturing will become mainstream and allows to small companies to be self-organized in industry communities.

I think for 2009 is a bit futuristic view, but if we will analyze situation in many industries, we will discover that processes toward decentralization, creating of bigger number of small suppliers and network organization already started to happen… So, I’d be interested to hear your voices and to discuss it with you.

Best, Oleg.


PLM Prompt: Should we combine PLM and PIM efforts?

July 20, 2009

Short prompt – I’m looking on definition of Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) and Product Information Management (PIM).

Product lifecycle management (PLM) is the process of managing the entire lifecycle of a product from its conception, through design and manufacture, to service and disposal. [1] PLM integrates people, data, processes and business systems and provides a product information backbone for companies and their extended enterprise.[2]

Product information management (PIM) or PIM refers to processes and technologies focused on centrally managing information about products, with a focus on the data required to market and sell the products through one or more distribution channels. A central set of product data can be used to feed consistent, accurate and up-to-date information to multiple output media such as web sites, print catalogs, ERP systems, and electronic data feeds to trading partners. PIM systems generally need to support multiple geographic locations, multi-lingual data, and maintenance and modification of product information within a centralized catalog to provide consistently accurate information to multiple channels in a cost-effective manner.

Even difference is clear, it looks like combination of PIM and PLM efforts can bring significant benefits to the company to streamline information management around a product.

Just my opinion. What do you think about it?


PLM Prompt: 3D, PLM and Eyetracking Technologies

July 20, 2009

I think we are moving fast toward combination of virtual and physical worlds. How we can get closer and combine our experience in these two words? In one of my previous prompts “Combine virtual and physical map overlay with G1″, I discussed how possible to merge physical and virtual maps.

Today my prompt is about how we can combine virtual modeling and virtual experience with eyetracking technologies. This is absolutely cool stuff if you think about it context of 3D modeling and virtual prototyping. Here few examples from company called Think.

eye-track-1

eye-track-2

I had chance to see also some eyetracking techno from our corporateblog 3D perspectives “Eye Tracking Super Power with Tobii”.

So, what do you think about it? Does it make sense in mainstream 3Dmodeling?

Best, Oleg


What is difference between PLM and Content Management System?

July 20, 2009

corporate acronymsDuring last week, I’ve been discussing with one of my long time friends different types of enterprise systems. Very fast we came to the conclusion that using TLA (Three Letter Acronyms), we stack very fast, and actually we need to figure out what is practically inside and what are those systems are doing (or expecting to do). So we passed all EIM, EDM, PDM, PIM, PLM, cPDM…. I want to discuss actually comparison between Product Lifecycle Management and Enterprise Content Management Systems. I think this combination happens very often in organization and I will be very interesting to discuss and have feedback from readers of PLM Think Tank about how they see these two systems.

According to the Wikipedia:

content management system (CMS) such as a document management system (DMS) is a computer application used to manage work flow needed to collaboratively create, edit, review, index, search, publish and archive various kinds of digital media and electronic text.[1] An enterprise content management (ECM) system is concerned with content, documents, details and records related to the organizational processes of an enterprise. The purpose is to manage the organization’s unstructured information content, with all its diversity of format and location.

Product lifecycle management (PLM) is the process of managing the entire lifecycle of a product from its conception, through design and manufacture, to service and disposal. [1] PLM integrates people, data, processes and business systems and provides a product information backbone for companies and their extended enterprise.[2] …. The core of PLM (product lifecycle management) is in the creations and central management of all product data and the technology used to access this information and knowledge.

So, the purpose of ECM is to manage organization’s information content and the core purpose of PLM is to manage all product data. So, with some simplification I came to the conclusion that both classes of systems are managing content. In my view, major piece of organization’s content in manufacturing organization is related to their products, and I’d expect product data to be hidden behind this magic word “content”. At the same time, it so called “product data” in PLM system is also sort of content, but probably very specific and related to special systems such as – CAD and BOM management. This is time to remember a magic word “unstructured” used by ECM definition. Since CAD and BOM management systems are very “structured” by nature, looks like ECM creators put fences and said “all non-CAD”… oops, content, belongs to ECM and CAD/BOM related stuff is going to PDM/PLM.

What is my conclusion from this analyzes? I think PLM vs. ECM is only small slice of enterprise system landscape. Enterprise systems successfully created so many overlapped silos. These silos and associated with these silos systems create very complex enterprise content, information, data and tools landscape. I think time is coming to rationalize this landscape.

So, what do you think? What is your company’s enterprise landscape? Do you have all possible data, product, information etc. management systems? How do you see these systems evolve in current economical situations?

Best, Oleg.


PLM Prompt: Will PLM adopt Microsoft Azure Dreams?

July 19, 2009

Note toward future. After long Microsoft related discussion about Office 2010 and SharePoint 2010, final, and more future oriented, prompt about coming Microsoft Azure platform. Microsoft will not be first in this cloud-services game. Nevertheless, may be some of PLM providers will find benefits to run on top of all possible services available from MS Azure Datacenters.

If you explore initial page of Azure Services, you can see .NET, Live, SQL services, but not only. There is SharePoint services and, what is remarkable, MS Dynamics CRM services.

Microsoft Azure Services

Microsoft Azure Services

Microsoft is starting their cloud game and announces agreesive cloud computing prices according to the WSJ.

I’m sure, for the moment, there are more questions and not answers. So, Sunday time dreams :) Azure… what do you think about this?

Best, Oleg


PLM Prompt: How PLM can do more with less effort?

July 17, 2009

I’m thinking, how PLM can become leaner and efficient. In today’s economical situation and even in general, to make PLM leaner will be good step. So, where is the problem?

I see 3 fundamental factors that prevent PLM from do so:

  1. PLM creates to many high-level expectations.
  2. PLM is trying to change development and business processes.
  3. PLM don’t have efficient technologies to integrate with enterprise systems.

I’m going to discuss it more in details next week. However, I will be interesting to hear your voices and your thoughts…

Best, Oleg


PLM Prompt: From IBM Lotus to Google Cloud – should PLM be worried?

July 17, 2009

Short note. Google released the package that allows to move from IBM Lotus Notes to Google Apps. Take a look on interesting video and Google blog with some interesting customer references.

My prompt today - should PLM world be worried? I think yes, since mail is one of the fundamental components of today’s enterprise communication and collaboration. IBM Lotus Notes installations were disrupted by MS SharePoint over the past few years and now will have an additional option to move to Google-y cloud. PLM is just in the queue…

Just my opinion. What do you think?


Office 2010 and PLM On Demand Solutions

July 17, 2009

The key part of all news about Office 2010 is free, browser based version of Microsoft’s most popular Office products. I can say, for the moment, well done Microsoft. When I’m pretty sure Microsoft mostly thoughts about growing Google Apps when decided to release a free browser version of Office products, I see these applications and technologies can provide opportunity for some new Product Lifecycle Management solutions. With all respect to everything PLM does, MS Office has significant portion of implementations related to CAD/PDM/PLM and other product development and manufacturing solutions based on MS Office products. Lots of people and organization are running Bill of Materials in excel and even more complex solutions. It’s interesting to see results of Spread Sheet Hell poll on SolidSmack.

So, with such introduction, my thoughts and ideas this morning was about how MS Office 2010 and surrounding products can facilitate introduction of new cloud-based PLM offerings on demand. The following technologies will be good enablers to make it happen:

1. Open Office XML format. Microsoft developed the initial version of this format and even taking into account all complexity about this standard activity, new XML format introduced in Office 2007 becomes mature in 2010. In my view, MOSS 2007 made great leverage of this format in their integration with MS Office 2007 products, and I’d expect this format provide solid foundation to build solutions on top.

2. Ribbons across all Office products including SharePoint will provide good foundation for single user experience.

3. Ability to reference external content such as video and other rich content (can be 3D CAD models and not only) from SharePoint location and from any other location will be foundation to mix design and engineering content in Office.

In addition to this, I’d like to mention two additional SharePoint 2010 features that can be used in combination with office.MS Visio 2010 and his combination with workflow tools is nice addition to become foundation for visual process monitoring and management.

Visio 2010 and Process Monitoring Environment

Visio 2010 and Process Monitoring Environment

Previously known as Groove and now Microsoft SharePoint Workspaces is interesting option to provide Offline/Online content synchronization. I think there is demand for such type of solution in PLM.

Offline Workspaces in SharePoint 2010

Offline Workspaces in SharePoint 2010

What is my conclusion? Even if final functional breakdown Office 2010 Browser version is not clear, I think this is good jumpstart foundation for future PLM solutions on demand. Combined with Office adoption in organization it facilitates IP distribution across organization and improves PLM adoption rate.

What do you think?

Best, Oleg


PLM Prompt: PLM Industry Learning Test

July 16, 2009

I’ve been reading amazing post by Larry Cheng about learning. “Look back 3–5 years from today and ask yourself if you could have been substantially more effective at your past job in your present form.  If you look back a few years and feel like in comparison to who you are today, you had little idea of what you were doing and would have done things a lot differently given what you now know, that’s a telltale sign of learning and growth”.

Now, I’m thinking about PLM industry and about what we did for our customers 3-5 years ago…

  • What do you think about products we released 5 years ago?
  • Do you think we are doing better now?
  • What are you feeling?

Just my thoughts…Best, Oleg


MS SharePoint 2010 – Is it good for PLM?

July 16, 2009

sharepoint-2010In the past, I had chance to discuss many of the available MOSS 2007 features and capabilities on PLM Think Tank. So far, we are moving forward, and SharePoint 2010 is coming on our horizon. When I’m still hoping to see the actual product in October, I will try to make my initial prediction and function analyze based on video and demo made by Tom Rizzo. This is, of course, not released software yet. However, even so, sneak peek video allows to make initial conclusions about what is potential of new coming features and capabilities of SharePoint for PLM. Also, when discussing them, I will try to provide my insight on what impact of these capabilities and features on PLM Software providers. I’d like to focus on top three areas of features and capabilities: Collaboration; Business Connectivity Services and Content Publishing.

Collaboration User Experience

It’s all about how do you feel in my view. I’d call SharePoint 2010 focus on user experience as “forward to future Office”. Microsoft is blurring even more difference between Office desktop apps and Browser user experience. SharePoint 2010 is getting Office Ribbon and lists with multi-select option. These two features will improve significantly way you can work inside of SharePoint.

sharepoint-collab-2010

In addition Microsoft did a very good job in my view by allowing browser apps to have Office look & feel, including ability to apply Office Themes across the browsers.

Office look & feel in IE

Office look & feel in IE

Office Look and Feel in FireFox

Office look & feel in FireFox

What does it mean for PLM? As much more SharePoint becomes of to be part of Windows/Microsoft’s platform, customer will be interested to see PLM vendors following this environment when it makes sense. A lot of PLM related information today is distributed between multiple Access databases and Excel files. PLM can provide better lifecycle control for this information, but customers are very interested in user experience these days. I’d call customer’s demand as following – “Don’t make me think”, when it comes to user experience.

BCS (Business Connectivity Services)

One of the key technologies in MOSS 2007 was Business Data Catalog (BDC). BDC allows to connect SharePoint to back-end / LOB (Line of Business) apps. The BDC capabilities in MOSS 2007 were limited to “Read Only” operations. In SharePoint 2010, new set of capabilities called Business Connectivity Services will be introduced. I’d call it “data on steroids in browser user interface”.

sharepoint-2010-bcs

Business Connectivity Services with read/write capabilities

Metadata view and update in Office applications

Metadata view and update in Office applications

What does it mean for PLM? Microsoft is blurring database and business-transaction-related application behavior inside of SharePoint list-oriented user experience. Data becomes more and more transparent inside of SharePoint. The good thing is that you need much less effort to build collaboration application using this infrastructure, in comparison to traditional way. In video preview, Microsoft demo it with SQL Server, which is, of course, the simplest task. It will be interesting to see in more detailed way how to trigger PLM business logic into BCS infrastructure.

Content Availability

Microsoft is presenting cool feature that allows you to use SharePoint content inside of Office Apps. As an example you can use video file located in SharePoint and embed it into PowerPoint. This approach develops new capability of lightweight containers (applications) that can include rich content. There are two positive implications. Content is more controlled this way. In today’s world, we copy content to make it available in Office apps. Tomorrow’s SharePoint 2010 and Office 2010 will allow us to be more “connected” to the single content source.

Publish Content to Office Apps from SharePoint

Publish Content to Office Apps from SharePoint

What it means for PLM? To be able to control content and stay connected is big advantage. The biggest PLM value proposition – control lifecycle of product information can be achieved in easier way using such techniques.

Initial Conclusion – How to catch up Collaboration?

It’s hard to see whole scope of SharePoint 2010 with such initial sneak peek video. I think Microsoft is on the right track and trying to capture competitive advantages of Office and SharePoint to provide an ultimate platform for collaboration. It’s too early to say how successful it will be. I think PLM vendors will need to do complex work sorting various Microsoft SharePoint features and capabilities to allow right mix of PLM collaborative business applications and Microsoft collaborative infrastructure.  So, “collaboration” becomes new buzzword to succeed in enterprise.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 63 other followers