<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Slice of PLM Single Version of Truth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://plmtwine.com/2009/06/18/my-slice-of-plm-single-version-of-truth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/06/18/my-slice-of-plm-single-version-of-truth/</link>
	<description>Product Lifecycle Management by Oleg Shilovitsky</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:36:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PLM Network Effect and Single Point of Truths &#171; Daily PLM Think Tank Blog</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/06/18/my-slice-of-plm-single-version-of-truth/#comment-9557</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PLM Network Effect and Single Point of Truths &#171; Daily PLM Think Tank Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 02:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plmtwine.com/?p=1822#comment-9557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] posts: PLM and A Single Point of Disagreement and Back to basics: PLM and Single Point of Truth and My slice of PLM Single Version of Truth. So, why I decided to come back to the story again? I want to add few perspectives on this in the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posts: PLM and A Single Point of Disagreement and Back to basics: PLM and Single Point of Truth and My slice of PLM Single Version of Truth. So, why I decided to come back to the story again? I want to add few perspectives on this in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PLM SharePoint Thoughts &#171; Daily PLM Think Tank Blog</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/06/18/my-slice-of-plm-single-version-of-truth/#comment-9554</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PLM SharePoint Thoughts &#171; Daily PLM Think Tank Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 02:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plmtwine.com/?p=1822#comment-9554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] posts: PLM and A Single Point of Disagreement and Back to basics: PLM and Single Point of Truth and My slice of PLM Single Version of Truth. So, why I decided to come back to the story again? I want to add few perspectives on this in the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posts: PLM and A Single Point of Disagreement and Back to basics: PLM and Single Point of Truth and My slice of PLM Single Version of Truth. So, why I decided to come back to the story again? I want to add few perspectives on this in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PLM Network Effect and Single Point of Truths</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/06/18/my-slice-of-plm-single-version-of-truth/#comment-9551</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PLM Network Effect and Single Point of Truths]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 02:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plmtwine.com/?p=1822#comment-9551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] posts: PLM and A Single Point of Disagreement and Back to basics: PLM and Single Point of Truth and My slice of PLM Single Version of Truth.  So, why I decided to come back to the story again? I want to add few perspectives on this in the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posts: PLM and A Single Point of Disagreement and Back to basics: PLM and Single Point of Truth and My slice of PLM Single Version of Truth.  So, why I decided to come back to the story again? I want to add few perspectives on this in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Cameron</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/06/18/my-slice-of-plm-single-version-of-truth/#comment-1363</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn Cameron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plmtwine.com/?p=1822#comment-1363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oleg, the Web 2.0 collaborative nature of Focal Point, supports &quot;centralization&quot; and transparency between IT &amp; the business lines and process models - eliminating the gaps that typically allow disagreement &amp; misalignment to occur. The value prop stack supports the same - Focal Point helps product development organizations to increase the success of their product lines by:

Capturing business inputs in the form of business and market requirements from customers, analysts, market research, and internal stakeholders

Utilize visualization, prioritization, and unique road mapping and planning capabilities to create plans that are valuable and achievable

Bridge the gap between the business and engineering by centralizing information key to decision-making, status reporting and portfolio reviews

Prioritize and visualize customer needs to reduce the risk of minimization or elimination during project delivery of the most valuable capabilities

Centralize information to escape the chaos of managing data in emails, documents, and spreadsheets, speeding the ability to respond to changing market and business conditions

Overcome the influence of the loudest voice in the room and use objective information to support decision making

Make enterprise architecture plans actionable and value-driven by assessing requests against business priorities, and road mapping alongside other initiatives.

I work very closely with IBM on these pillars, and define success like YOU DO, via collaboration, per MANY of your previous posts Oleg.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oleg, the Web 2.0 collaborative nature of Focal Point, supports &#8220;centralization&#8221; and transparency between IT &amp; the business lines and process models &#8211; eliminating the gaps that typically allow disagreement &amp; misalignment to occur. The value prop stack supports the same &#8211; Focal Point helps product development organizations to increase the success of their product lines by:</p>
<p>Capturing business inputs in the form of business and market requirements from customers, analysts, market research, and internal stakeholders</p>
<p>Utilize visualization, prioritization, and unique road mapping and planning capabilities to create plans that are valuable and achievable</p>
<p>Bridge the gap between the business and engineering by centralizing information key to decision-making, status reporting and portfolio reviews</p>
<p>Prioritize and visualize customer needs to reduce the risk of minimization or elimination during project delivery of the most valuable capabilities</p>
<p>Centralize information to escape the chaos of managing data in emails, documents, and spreadsheets, speeding the ability to respond to changing market and business conditions</p>
<p>Overcome the influence of the loudest voice in the room and use objective information to support decision making</p>
<p>Make enterprise architecture plans actionable and value-driven by assessing requests against business priorities, and road mapping alongside other initiatives.</p>
<p>I work very closely with IBM on these pillars, and define success like YOU DO, via collaboration, per MANY of your previous posts Oleg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olegshilovitsky</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/06/18/my-slice-of-plm-single-version-of-truth/#comment-1360</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[olegshilovitsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plmtwine.com/?p=1822#comment-1360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glenn, This is great demo. I&#039;m sure SaaS, WebServices can change and improve what we have today. But the problem of corporate agreement remains the same... don&#039;t you think so? Is there chance to make businesses to agree on way they are managing data and processes? this is painful in my view.... what do you think about this? -Oleg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn, This is great demo. I&#8217;m sure SaaS, WebServices can change and improve what we have today. But the problem of corporate agreement remains the same&#8230; don&#8217;t you think so? Is there chance to make businesses to agree on way they are managing data and processes? this is painful in my view&#8230;. what do you think about this? -Oleg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olegshilovitsky</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/06/18/my-slice-of-plm-single-version-of-truth/#comment-1359</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[olegshilovitsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plmtwine.com/?p=1822#comment-1359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Josh, In my view, organization have long path to agree on what they are doing and consolidate their plans, ways to manage data, processes etc. What is proposed today by most of the vendors is phased approach that allows to customers to do it in phases. My point is if agreement ever possible. Idea is to transform PLM systems to manage change and not single point of truth. -Regards, Oleg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josh, In my view, organization have long path to agree on what they are doing and consolidate their plans, ways to manage data, processes etc. What is proposed today by most of the vendors is phased approach that allows to customers to do it in phases. My point is if agreement ever possible. Idea is to transform PLM systems to manage change and not single point of truth. -Regards, Oleg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Cameron</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/06/18/my-slice-of-plm-single-version-of-truth/#comment-1358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn Cameron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plmtwine.com/?p=1822#comment-1358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good thought as well Josh, and as Oleg has posted in the past about the simplicity of SaaS PLM, which again, is captured in this brief 5-minute demo on FocalPoint: http://www.telelogic.com/campaigns/2007/global/fp_auto_demo/index.cfm . More support for EAI/ERP/BPM via web-services is there as well, making the deployment a less conplex offering, AND addressing KPI &amp; ROI metrics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thought as well Josh, and as Oleg has posted in the past about the simplicity of SaaS PLM, which again, is captured in this brief 5-minute demo on FocalPoint: <a href="http://www.telelogic.com/campaigns/2007/global/fp_auto_demo/index.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.telelogic.com/campaigns/2007/global/fp_auto_demo/index.cfm</a> . More support for EAI/ERP/BPM via web-services is there as well, making the deployment a less conplex offering, AND addressing KPI &amp; ROI metrics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/06/18/my-slice-of-plm-single-version-of-truth/#comment-1357</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plmtwine.com/?p=1822#comment-1357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So why do implementations have to be big and complex? how can it be simplified?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So why do implementations have to be big and complex? how can it be simplified?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olegshilovitsky</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/06/18/my-slice-of-plm-single-version-of-truth/#comment-1356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[olegshilovitsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plmtwine.com/?p=1822#comment-1356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glenn, I appreciate your comments! Can you share (or point) on your methods and way to set ROI expectations? Do you believe, organizational agreement is achievable? or vendors need to handle it using technological and not organizational approach? 
Thanks, Oleg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn, I appreciate your comments! Can you share (or point) on your methods and way to set ROI expectations? Do you believe, organizational agreement is achievable? or vendors need to handle it using technological and not organizational approach?<br />
Thanks, Oleg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Cameron</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/06/18/my-slice-of-plm-single-version-of-truth/#comment-1355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn Cameron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://plmtwine.com/?p=1822#comment-1355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oleg, another great thought-provoking post! I am ALL about defining the ROI &amp; KPI&#039;s BEFORE the PLM success criteria are set, and as I am exclusively working with IBM-Focal Point for my PLM Practice, and as it has financial-metrics &amp; BPM Analysis inherent in its collaboration model. Setting ROI expectations are a fully integrated part of my (&amp; my firm&#039;s) value proposition.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oleg, another great thought-provoking post! I am ALL about defining the ROI &amp; KPI&#8217;s BEFORE the PLM success criteria are set, and as I am exclusively working with IBM-Focal Point for my PLM Practice, and as it has financial-metrics &amp; BPM Analysis inherent in its collaboration model. Setting ROI expectations are a fully integrated part of my (&amp; my firm&#8217;s) value proposition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

