<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: COFES 2009: PLM vs not PLM?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://plmtwine.com/2009/04/17/cofes-2009-plm-vs-not-plm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/04/17/cofes-2009-plm-vs-not-plm/</link>
	<description>Product Lifecycle Management by Oleg Shilovitsky</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:59:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PLM Prompt: PLM, non-PLM, PDM&#8230; where is difference? &#171; Daily PLM Think Tank Blog</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/04/17/cofes-2009-plm-vs-not-plm/#comment-1852</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PLM Prompt: PLM, non-PLM, PDM&#8230; where is difference? &#171; Daily PLM Think Tank Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olegshilo.wordpress.com/?p=1218#comment-1852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Actually, my first one was from COFES 2009 (PLM vs. non-PLM). It was Brad Holtz&#8217;s slide. You can see it here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Actually, my first one was from COFES 2009 (PLM vs. non-PLM). It was Brad Holtz&#8217;s slide. You can see it here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olegshilovitsky</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/04/17/cofes-2009-plm-vs-not-plm/#comment-747</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[olegshilovitsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olegshilo.wordpress.com/?p=1218#comment-747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree, there is no consolidation, but indeed, I think there is some discussion and this is already positive.   With all &quot;hate and love&quot; relationship to PLM term, I don&#039;t see any visible alternative. Actually conversation &quot;PLM vs not PLM&quot; just confirms that we still need to find it. -Oleg.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, there is no consolidation, but indeed, I think there is some discussion and this is already positive.   With all &#8220;hate and love&#8221; relationship to PLM term, I don&#8217;t see any visible alternative. Actually conversation &#8220;PLM vs not PLM&#8221; just confirms that we still need to find it. -Oleg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Holtz</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/04/17/cofes-2009-plm-vs-not-plm/#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad Holtz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olegshilo.wordpress.com/?p=1218#comment-745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I do feel that there is no consolidation of the different visions that people label as PLM, which is why I (and others) believe the term has outlived its usefulness.  

For the record, the domain of Cyon Research is primarily that of the tools used for design and engineering. I did not mean to imply that &quot;design and engineering software&quot; is the term that we should use to replace &quot;PLM&quot;  -- it&#039;s not a good substitute.   Still looking.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do feel that there is no consolidation of the different visions that people label as PLM, which is why I (and others) believe the term has outlived its usefulness.  </p>
<p>For the record, the domain of Cyon Research is primarily that of the tools used for design and engineering. I did not mean to imply that &#8220;design and engineering software&#8221; is the term that we should use to replace &#8220;PLM&#8221;  &#8212; it&#8217;s not a good substitute.   Still looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olegshilovitsky</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/04/17/cofes-2009-plm-vs-not-plm/#comment-731</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[olegshilovitsky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olegshilo.wordpress.com/?p=1218#comment-731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Francois, you are right... actually my feeling about PLM on COFES was that everybody have their own definition of PLM. No consolidation. The preferred term by Cyon Research is design and engineering software. For me it sounds may be too narrow. Interesting to hear Brad, may be commenting on this. -Oleg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Francois, you are right&#8230; actually my feeling about PLM on COFES was that everybody have their own definition of PLM. No consolidation. The preferred term by Cyon Research is design and engineering software. For me it sounds may be too narrow. Interesting to hear Brad, may be commenting on this. -Oleg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: François</title>
		<link>http://plmtwine.com/2009/04/17/cofes-2009-plm-vs-not-plm/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[François]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://olegshilo.wordpress.com/?p=1218#comment-729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello

Yes nice to have both definitions on the same slide! Except it feels like having to sell something, it well resumes the point.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello</p>
<p>Yes nice to have both definitions on the same slide! Except it feels like having to sell something, it well resumes the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

