New Social Bill Of Material Tool is the Way to Simplify PLM Deployment in Organizations

During the weekend, I was reading Mid-Market PLM Deployment Challenges by Tom Gill from CPDA. He wrote about multiple issues customers face during the implementation of PLM systems. Tom mentioned multiple issues such as economical barriers of implementing something beyond of AutoCAD managed by Excel; the need to implement more simple industry-oriented, process-based applications, the lower price point for customers of smaller sized-companies. One of his recommendations was to decrease the complexity of deployment and the need to make simpler systems. All these recommendations were based on analyses of challenges make a lot of sense. 

I’d like to come with an idea of a fundamental, initial step that would simplify the way of smaller customers to PLM. I think that the key for a company is “PLM content”. Today, “PLM content” is not under control in most of mid-size companies. PLM content is spread over multiple sources of activity: (1) PDM systems manage CAD drawings; (2) Multiple Excel files (imported/exports into Bill of Materials; (3) Word documents outlines customer requirements; (3) Homegrown ERP systems manages Items Master information and others.

 What can we propose for a company that literally cannot invest significant resources in the establishment of a PLM system? The company needs to start gradually, building its PLM content from the Bill of Materials and Item (or Part Numbers) information. This needs to be the key information so that the company can start to manage their information centrally. Later, this content will become the core of the PLM system. This system needs to include two basic components for such a management system – (1) Part Numbers /Items/ and (2) Multiple Bill of Materials. As soon as this information is established, the rest of the information such as drawing, supplied part, and manufacturing information will be linked and connected to this content.

 Even if there are multiple systems in the market, I think that these systems survive from the complexity and the intensive support required in order to implement a PLM system. Newcomers need to propose a way of managing Bill of Materials and Items differently. They need to eliminate the educational barrier and propose a simple user experience practice. (For example, native typing in a grid combined with search functionality). I’d like to refer to these as Excel-like social services. They also need to provide a user-friendly way of creating and managing Item/BOM content. This content need to be searchable for all users in the organization, utilizing multiple devices – personal computers, PDAs etc.

 More practically, I am looking for a Wiki-style application that can provide  an Excel-like user experience for content authoring. From a technological standpoint, MS Excel Server provides an easy way of rendering Excel data in IE. I think that developers of such a system can leverage this Excel services. Additional collaborative capabilities can be provided by Instant Messaging, Video Conferencing and workflow services.

About these ads

2 Responses to New Social Bill Of Material Tool is the Way to Simplify PLM Deployment in Organizations

  1. You are seriously mistaken and maybe even delusional when you say – “Today, PLM content is not under control in most of mid-size companies. PLM content is spread over multiple sources of activity: (1) PDM systems manage CAD drawings; (2) Multiple Excel files (imported/exports into Bill of Materials; (3) Word documents outlines customer requirements; (4) Homegrown ERP systems manages Items Master information and others.”!

    Just because you sell a system that provides control it doesn’t mean people are out of control. If these customers were not under control they could not produce a product and make a return. Besides aren’t 1-4 a means of control?

    Follow down to your next paragraph and I think you will see the problem is you not them. “What can we propose for a company that literally cannot invest significant resources in the establishment of a PLM system?” These companies CAN INVEST! They buy CAD, CNC machines and all sorts of other things. Sounds more like the cost of implementation is not out weighted by the value of the system!

    At the end, rather than yelling at the score board, you hit on an important point. Customers want a simpler way that better fits their needs. A wiki-styled environment that provides improved organization of the development information and process…

  2. Chris,
    I our major misunderstanding is in what you and me see as “control”. For me control is firs of all ability to monitor and access. Yes, today companies are buying CAD systems and CNC machines, but at the same time very often send wrong version of document or model from CAD system to CNC machine and manufacturing department. I don’t see control in ability to store and access this information in one system. This is literally impossible. Companies that tries this “single system servers everybody” fails in very expensive implementations and long IT projects. I see such projects are similar to dinosaurs today. Therefore, my proposal is start implementing applications (or you can call it services if you follow more technological language style) providing answer on specific customer needs. I took example of Bill of Material since everything starts and ends in Bill of Material. But I like idea of “design discussion” too. This is potential application to end unstructured mail overflow in design organization.
    Oleg.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 252 other followers

%d bloggers like this: